Bond SP01 - - Strain Penetration Model for Fully Anchored Steel Reinforcing Bars: Difference between revisions

From OpenSeesWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: This command is used to construct a uniaxial material object for capturing strain penetration effects at the column-to-footing, column-to-bridge bent caps, and wall-to-footing intersection...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This command is used to construct a uniaxial material object for capturing strain penetration effects at the column-to-footing, column-to-bridge bent caps, and wall-to-footing intersections. In these cases, the bond slip associated with strain penetration typically occurs along a portion of the anchorage length. This model can also be applied to the beam end regions, where the strain penetration may include slippage of the bar along the entire anchorage length, but the model parameters should be chosen appropriately.
This command is used to construct a uniaxial material object for capturing strain penetration effects at the column-to-footing, column-to-bridge bent caps, and wall-to-footing intersections. In these cases, the bond slip associated with strain penetration typically occurs along a portion of the anchorage length. This model can also be applied to the beam end regions, where the strain penetration may include slippage of the bar along the entire anchorage length, but the model parameters should be chosen appropriately.
 
{|  
{|
| style="background:yellow; color:black; width:800px" | '''uniaxialMaterial Bond_SP01 $matTag $Fy $Sy $Fu $Su $b $R'''
| uniaxialMaterial Bond_SP01 $matTag $Fy $Sy $Fu $Su $b $R
\}
\}


This model is for fully anchored steel reinforcement bars that experience bond slip along a portion of the anchorage length due to strain penetration effects, which are usually the case for column and wall longitudinal bars anchored into footings or bridge joints
This model is for fully anchored steel reinforcement bars that experience bond slip along a portion of the anchorage length due to strain penetration effects, which are usually the case for column and wall longitudinal bars anchored into footings or bridge joints
----


----
----
Line 14: Line 11:
|  style="width:150px" | '''$matTag ''' || integer tag identifying material
|  style="width:150px" | '''$matTag ''' || integer tag identifying material
|-
|-
| '''$Fy || Yield strength of the reinforcement steel
| '''$Fy''' || Yield strength of the reinforcement steel
|-
| '''$Sy''' || Rebar slip at member interface under yield stress. (see NOTES below)
|-
| '''$Fu''' || Ultimate strength of the reinforcement steel
|-
|-
| $Sy ||Rebar slip at member interface under yield stress from:
| '''$Su''' || Rebar slip at the loaded end at the bar fracture strength
|-
| '''$b''' || Initial hardening ratio in the monotonic slip vs. bar stress response (0.3~0.5)
|-
| '''$R''' || Pinching factor for the cyclic slip vs. bar response (0.5~1.0)
|}


or


db: rebar diameter
NOTES:


$Fy: yield strength of the reinforcement steel
REFERENCES:


# Zhao, J., and S. Sritharan. (2007) Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ACI Structural Journal, 104(2), pp. 133-141.


fc': concrete compressive strength of the adjoining connection member
WEBSITE:


alpha: parameter used in the local bond-slip relation and can be taken as 0.4 in accordance with CEB-FIP Model Code 90
#http://www.uwm.edu/~jzhao/Bond_SP01_pages/Bond_index.html
|-
 
| $Fu || Ultimate strength of the reinforcement steel
 
|-
----
|$Su || Rebar slip at the loaded end at the bar fracture strength
 
|-
 
| $b || Initial hardening ratio in the monotonic slip vs. bar stress response (0.3~0.5)
Code Developed by: <span style="color:blue">Jian Zhao, University of Wisconsin, Milwakee </span>
|-
and  <span style="color:blue"> Sri Sritharan, Iowa State University</span>
| $R || Pinching factor for the cyclic slip vs. bar response (0.5~1.0)
|}

Revision as of 21:44, 20 October 2009

This command is used to construct a uniaxial material object for capturing strain penetration effects at the column-to-footing, column-to-bridge bent caps, and wall-to-footing intersections. In these cases, the bond slip associated with strain penetration typically occurs along a portion of the anchorage length. This model can also be applied to the beam end regions, where the strain penetration may include slippage of the bar along the entire anchorage length, but the model parameters should be chosen appropriately.

uniaxialMaterial Bond_SP01 $matTag $Fy $Sy $Fu $Su $b $R

\}

This model is for fully anchored steel reinforcement bars that experience bond slip along a portion of the anchorage length due to strain penetration effects, which are usually the case for column and wall longitudinal bars anchored into footings or bridge joints


$matTag integer tag identifying material
$Fy Yield strength of the reinforcement steel
$Sy Rebar slip at member interface under yield stress. (see NOTES below)
$Fu Ultimate strength of the reinforcement steel
$Su Rebar slip at the loaded end at the bar fracture strength
$b Initial hardening ratio in the monotonic slip vs. bar stress response (0.3~0.5)
$R Pinching factor for the cyclic slip vs. bar response (0.5~1.0)


NOTES:

REFERENCES:

  1. Zhao, J., and S. Sritharan. (2007) Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ACI Structural Journal, 104(2), pp. 133-141.

WEBSITE:

  1. http://www.uwm.edu/~jzhao/Bond_SP01_pages/Bond_index.html




Code Developed by: Jian Zhao, University of Wisconsin, Milwakee and Sri Sritharan, Iowa State University