Problems with .sln when moving OpenSees Folder

For developers writing C++, Fortran, Java, code who have questions or comments to make.

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
blaiman
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:59 am
Location: RISA Tech, Inc.

Problems with .sln when moving OpenSees Folder

Post by blaiman »

Hey all,

Wondering if anyone else has come across this problem before and/or know how to solve this problem. If I move the whole OpenSees folder from the original drive or folder where I obtained through SVN and reopen the the .sln solution and try to build, I obtain the following message:

"The project file '' has been renamed or is no longer in the solution."

I've never ran into this problem before with the previous versions of OpenSees. Any input or solution to this will help. Thanks! By the way I have not modified anything at all of the source code, so I don't know why it gives me this problem.
Brighton Laiman
Development Engineer
RISA Technologies
Foothill Ranch, CA
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: Problems with .sln when moving OpenSees Folder

Post by fmk »

you could try removing the Win32 directory from the new location and then doing an svn update from the main directory.
blaiman
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:59 am
Location: RISA Tech, Inc.

Re: Problems with .sln when moving OpenSees Folder

Post by blaiman »

Thanks Frank, but my concern is if I started to make modifications to the .sln and move the folder then I won't be able to build or work with the .sln anymore. Any more suggestions or tips for this problem? Thanks!
Brighton Laiman
Development Engineer
RISA Technologies
Foothill Ranch, CA
fmk
Site Admin
Posts: 5884
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: UC Berkeley
Contact:

Re: Problems with .sln when moving OpenSees Folder

Post by fmk »

svn des not seem to merge svn files all that well. if you are making changes they are going to get overwritten if you do an update. that is why we encouarage developers to use the dll approach as thay only need the latest .exe and the upto date core files.
Post Reply