Problem about dynamic Analysis Time and NumSteps ?

Forum for OpenSees users to post questions, comments, etc. on the use of the OpenSees interpreter, OpenSees.exe

Moderators: silvia, selimgunay, Moderators

Post Reply
yones
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 7:42 am
Location: Iran , Azad University of Dezful

Problem about dynamic Analysis Time and NumSteps ?

Post by yones »

Dear all,
I have a quesion about dynamic Analysis Time.
when we have Uniform Excitation pattern with acceleration record file , the analyze command is define as:

analyze $NumSteps $DtAnalysis

where "NumSteps" is number of steps and "DtAnalysis" is time-step increment .
if we assume that data number of acceleration record is 2000 and time of steps is 0.02 second (time of ground motion : 2000*0.02=40 sec)

How we define the analyze command($NumSteps and $DtAnalysis) ?

Thanks.
tazarv
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:08 am
Location: University of Nevada Reno
Contact:

Re: Problem about dynamic Analysis Time and NumSteps ?

Post by tazarv »

As far as I know, these two are totally different. In OpenSees you have the option of two different input and output format. For example, your input acceleration is 2000*0.02=40 sec. However, output can be totally different such as 4000*0.01=40 or 2000*0.005=10sec or 3000*0.02=60sec, it can be anything. But you should notice that after 40sec of input acceleration, analysis will be free vibration.

Bests,
Mostafa Tazarv
yones
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 7:42 am
Location: Iran , Azad University of Dezful

Re: Problem about dynamic Analysis Time and NumSteps ?

Post by yones »

tazarv wrote:
> As far as I know, these two are totally different. In OpenSees you have the
> option of two different input and output format. For example, your input
> acceleration is 2000*0.02=40 sec. However, output can be totally different
> such as 4000*0.01=40 or 2000*0.005=10sec or 3000*0.02=60sec, it can be
> anything. But you should notice that after 40sec of input acceleration,
> analysis will be free vibration.
>
> Bests,

hi tazarv ,
thank you very much.
Post Reply